Cases 1 - 10 of 16
HEWETT v. GROH et al
as 1:2019cv02386
Plaintiff:
HELEN HEWETT
Defendant:
GINA GROH, SANDERS, BRIDGETTE COHEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREENE v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2019cv01926
Defendant:
CARL SYKES, VINCENT HILL, BUTCH CONWAY and others
Plaintiff:
LAUREN GREENE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLYBURN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv01622
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
Plaintiff:
BRIDGETTE CLYBURN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CADOCHE v. HOLFORD
as 1:2018cv01698
Plaintiff:
GALIQUOGI' DINAH DEAS CADOCHE and BRIDGETTE CHAPMAN
Defendant:
ROBERT GEORGE HOLFORD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CADOCHE v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON et al
as 1:2018cv01699
Defendant:
THOMAS A. ADAMS, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, NORMAN ST. GEORGE and others
Plaintiff:
GALIQUOGI' DINAH DEAS CADOCHE and BRIDGETTE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
CARMICHAEL v. GREGORY
as 1:2014cv01702
Plaintiff:
BRIDGETTE CARMICHAEL
Defendant:
RAYMOND GREGORY
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
NEAL v. BRIDGETTE TARA NEAL SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST et al
as 1:2014cv01105
Plaintiff:
BRIDGETTE TARA NEAL
Defendant:
BRIDGETTE TARA NEAL SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST, BRIDGETTE TARA NEAL CESTUI QUE TRUST and UNITED STATES COMPANY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CANOPIUS US INSURANCE, INC. v. SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT, LLC
as 1:2014cv00105
Plaintiff:
CANOPIUS US INSURANCE, INC.
Defendant:
SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT, LLC, BRIDGETTE CARMICHAEL JOHNSON, MURRY'S OF MARYLAND, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
