Cases 1 - 10 of 268
Sapp v. Raven Protection Technologies, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Hope Sapp
Defendant:
Raven Protection Technologies, LLC doing business as Lanai Bright and Steve Attard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bright v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv14093
Plaintiff:
DELORES BRIGHT
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Bright v. Harmon
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Carnell W. Bright
Defendant:
Ricky Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bright v. Clark et al
as 5:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Carnell Bright
Defendant:
FNU Clark and FNU Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Fabrizio et al
as 0:2024cv60303
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Adams
Defendant:
Officer Ryan Fabrizio, Sergeant Steve Lambert, Detective Eddy Velazquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Laborant, LLC. v. Bright Health Group, Inc.
as 0:2024cv60030
Plaintiff:
Laborant, LLC, d/b/a Arcpoint Labs of Coral Springs and Laborant, LLC. d/b/a Arcpoint Labs of Coral Springs
Defendant:
Bright Health Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
