Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 52
James Ross v. Brigitte Amsberry, et al
as 18-35692
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES ARTHUR ROSS
Defendant - Appellee: BRIGITTE AMSBERRY, Supt. of TRCI, KELLY A. RATHS, KELLY L. ARRINGTON and others
Jeremy Lovelady v. Brigitte Amsberry
as 18-72047
Petitioner: JEREMY RAY LOVELADY
Respondent: BRIGITTE AMSBERRY
Suarez v. Amsberry et al
as 2:2018cv01357
Plaintiff: Pedro Delgado Suarez
Defendant: Superintendent Brigitte Amsberry, Asst. Superintendent Richard McGraw and Lieutenant J. Duchek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan Newsome v. Brigitte Amsberry
as 18-35280
Petitioner - Appellant: RYAN C. NEWSOME
Respondent - Appellee: BRIGITTE AMSBERRY, Superintendent TRCI
Matecki v. Amsberry We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00461
Respondent: Brigitte Amsberry
Petitioner: John Jay Matecki, III
Unknown: Lisa Hay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Redmond v. Amsberry
as 2:2018cv00319
Respondent: Brigitte Amsberry
Unknown: Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner: David Lee Redmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wonnacott v. Oregon Dep. of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02007
Defendant: Brigitte Amsberry, Lt. C. Bauer, L. Braun and others
Plaintiff: David Edgar Wonnacott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Amsberry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01960
Defendant: Brigitte Amsberry, Kelly L. Arrington, S. Deacon and others
Plaintiff: James Arthur Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Acosta v. Brigitte Amsberry
as 17-35789
Petitioner - Appellant: THOMAS P. ACOSTA
Respondent - Appellee: BRIGITTE AMSBERRY
Hadley v. Amsberry
as 2:2017cv01532
Defendant: Brigitte Amsberry
Plaintiff: Chad Austin Hadley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?