Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Parker v. Goshen Realty Corporation et al
as 5:2011cv00136
Plaintiff:
Dyra Parker
Defendant:
Goshen Realty Corporation , Bristol Properties Corporation , Variety Wholesalers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barlow v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
as 1:2009cv01789
Plaintiff:
Phillip Barlow
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - E.R.I.S.A.
Type:
Labor
LandAmerica Onestop, Inc. v. Mittleider et al
as 1:2009cv00562
Plaintiff:
LandAmerica Onestop, Inc. and LandAmerica Onestop, Inc.
Defendant:
Douglas K. Mittleider, Healthprime, Inc., HP/Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Masters et al v. Harkleroad et al
as 1:2008cv00034
Plaintiff:
Willliam E. Masters, Willliam E. Masters, Willliam E. Masters and others
Defendant:
Donald R. Harkleroad, Bristol Ventures LLC, Bristol Corporation The and others
Counter Claimant:
Donald R. Harkleroad, Bristol Ventures LLC, Bristol Corporation The and others
Counter Defendant:
William E Masters, William E Masters, William E Masters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Eaton v. Wyeth, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00098
Plaintiff:
Leonard John Eaton
Defendant:
Wyeth, Inc., Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pharmacia & Upjohn Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tausch v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2007cv01209
Plaintiff:
Susan Tausch
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. and E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
