Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Earnest Woods, II v. Ron Broomfield
as 21-56233
Petitioner / Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS II
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden
Earnest Woods, II v. Ron Broomfield
as 21-71366
Petitioner:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS II
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden
Ward Weaver, Jr. v. Ron Broomfield
as 21-99010
Petitioner / Appellant:
WARD FRANCIS WEAVER, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden, San Quentin State Prison
Douglas Clark v. Ron Broomfield
as 21-99008
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOUGLAS DANIEL CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quetin and RON BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
John Foley v. John Felts, et al
as 21-2889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John D. Foley
Defendant / Appellee:
John Felts, Chairman, Arkansas Parole Board, Benny Mangess, Member of Parole Board, Individual and Official Capacity, Bobby Glover, Member of Parole Board, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Glenn McCurdy v. Ron Broomfield
as 21-71166
Petitioner:
GLENN J. MCCURDY
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden
USA v. Byron Broomfield
as 21-2061
Defendant / Appellant:
BYRON BROOMFIELD
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Terrance Proctor v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction, et al
as 21-2114
Defendant / Appellee:
Benny Magness, Member, Board of Corrections, in his Official and Individual Capacities, James B. Depriest, In his Official and Individual Capacities, Lona McCastlain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terrance Proctor
Darryl Burghardt v. L. Borges, et al
as 21-15736
Defendant / Appellee:
J. RENTERIA, D. GOREE, Jr., D. OSUMA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL BURGHARDT
Rudolph Moralez v. Ron Davis, et al
as 21-15719
Defendant / Appellee:
MATT VERDIER, RON DAVIS, Warden, RALPH DIAZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUDOLPH MORALEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
