Cases 31 - 40 of 218
Griego v. Brown
as 1:2023cv00267
Petitioner:
Antoin Griego
Respondent:
Tyler Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Irvin v. Brown
as 1:2022cv03259
Petitioner:
Marquise A. Irvin
Respondent:
Tyler S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2022cv02516
Plaintiff:
Clarence Lee Brown
Defendant:
S. Sandoval, Kessler and B. Arteaga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kessman v. Smoyer et al
as 1:2022cv01860
Plaintiff:
Bradley C. Kessman
Defendant:
Smoyer, Ryan Myatt, Christopher Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. No Named Defedant
as 1:2022cv01253
Plaintiff:
Reginald Brown
Defendant:
No Named Defedant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Kellog Brown and Root
as 1:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Mario Zachariah Vargas
Defendant:
Kellog Brown and Root, Mario Vargas, KBR Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kessman v. Roberts et al
as 1:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
Bradley C. Kessman
Defendant:
Matthew Roberts, City of Loveland Police Dept., Smoyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kessman v. Roberts et al
as 1:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Bradley C. Kessman
Defendant:
Matthew Roberts, Loveland Police Dept., Balkema and others
Respondent:
Justin E Smith, Moll, Christopher Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abu-Nantambu-El v. Mr. Long
as 1:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Abdu-Latif Kazembe Abu-Nantambu-El
Defendant:
Long, (I) Long, Major Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Long et al
as 1:2022cv00386
Petitioner:
Lelyen Brown
Respondent:
Jeff Long and Phil Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
