Cases 21 - 30 of 128
John Odoms v. NDOC Utilization Review Panel, et al
as 13-16459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN B. ODOMS
Defendant - Appellee:
NDOC UTILIZATION REVIEW PANEL, JAMES COX, BRUCE BANNISTER and others
Reberger v. Baker et al
as 3:2013cv00378
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Bruce Bannister, Mr. Baze and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Reberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilgus v. Bannister
as 3:2013cv00368
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, Bellanger, J. Buchanan and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Everett Wilgus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Odoms v. NDOC Utilization Review Panel et al
as 3:2013cv00193
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, James Cox, Director of Nursing and others
Plaintiff:
J. Benjamin Odoms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odoms v. NDOC Utilization Review Panel et al
as 3:2013cv00181
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, James Cox, Director of Nursing and others
Plaintiff:
J. Benjamin Odoms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Baker et al
as 3:2013cv00163
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Bruce Bannister, Nurse Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Fernandez v. Glen Whorton, et al
as 13-15583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LYNN FERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
GLEN WHORTON, GREG COX, BRUCE BANNISTER and others
John Layton v. Robert Bannister
as 13-15362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN LEE LAYTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT BRUCE BANNISTER
Hooks v. Bannister et al
as 3:2012cv00682
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, Ronald Bryant, Harold Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vails v. Williams et al
as 2:2012cv02064
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Dr. Bruce Bannister, Cheryl Burson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Vails, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
