Cases 11 - 20 of 204
Bibbs v. Collier et al
as 3:2023cv02596
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Bibbs
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Timothy Fitzpatrick and John Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGrew v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv01155
Plaintiff:
Andrew McGrew
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Bryan Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Collier
as 3:2023cv02495
Petitioner:
Dralon Duran Patterson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobb v. Collier et al
as 7:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cobb
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden J Smith, Sr and Sgt. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Hayes et al
as 2:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Demenzia Montwell Mitchell
Defendant:
Bridgette Y Hayes, Chrystal W Wagner and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. O'Daniel et al
as 7:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
David Allen Kelly
Defendant:
Patrick L. O'Daniel, Bryan Collier, Kevin B. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atkins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00192
Petitioner:
John Louis Atkins
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker et al v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Matthew Baker, Robert Andrews, Timothy Cone and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaycox v. TDCJ ID Agency et al
as 5:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Floyd Junior Jaycox
Defendant:
TDCJ ID Agency, Bryan Collier, John Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Collier
as 4:2023cv00941
Petitioner:
David Wayne Black
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
