Cases 11 - 20 of 346
Thomas v. Amonett et al
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett, Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Judge Ana Martinez et al
as 4:2023cv04478
Plaintiff:
Darren Tranell Hughes
Defendant:
Judge Ana Martinez, Bryan Collier, Sheriff Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Morton et al
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Dr. Gary Morton, Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett, Dr. Lanette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birdow v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Austin D. Birdow
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and C.F. Hazlewood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Collier et al;
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cobb
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bryan Collier, Warden J Smith, Sr and Sgt. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowley v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Michael Crowley
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Sammiego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Speer v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2023cv03958
Plaintiff:
William Keith Speer
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier and Kelly Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Collier
as 2:2023cv00228
Petitioner:
David Wayne Black
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv03033
Plaintiff:
Jedidiah Isaac Murphy
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Kelly Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Crowley v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael Crowley
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Asst Warden Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
