Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Floyd v. Pioneer Natural Resources Company et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff: Michael Floyd
Defendant: Pioneer Natural Resources Company, J. Kenneth Thompson, Richard P. Dealy and others
Kennedy v. Buchanan Automotive, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01864
Plaintiff: Kevin Kennedy
Defendant: Buchanan Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
USA v. Michael Buchanan
as 22-1124
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL ERIC BUCHANAN
USA v. Michael Buchanan
as 22-1125
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL ERIC BUCHANAN
Coffman v. The Michaels Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00420
Defendant: The Michaels Companies, Inc., John J. Mahoney, Beryl B. Raff and others
Plaintiff: Catherine Coffman
Sanchez v. The Michaels Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00410
Plaintiff: Alex Sanchez
Defendant: The Michaels Companies, Inc., John J. Mahoney, Beryl B. Raff and others
Griffin v. The Michaels Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00412
Defendant: The Michaels Companies, Inc., John J. Mahoney, Beryl B. Raff and others
Plaintiff: Gilbert Griffin
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No. PA WA HL-004.5, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1613
Defendant / Appellee: JAMES M. BUCHANAN AND DIANE ZACK BUCHANAN FARM #4 LP, and, PEOPLES NATURAL GAS CO, c/o Corporation Service Company, GRETCHEN RHEINLANDER, husband and wife and others
Defendant: FRED C. STROUD, BARBARA MINGES SHEPERD, PNC MORTGAGE, a division of PNC Bank, Nation Association and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROVER PIPELINE LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02207
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: David Buchanan
as 14-3319
Petitioner: In re: DAVID J. BUCHANAN
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?