Cases 11 - 20 of 163
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3016
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1951
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1752
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ojo v. Decker
as 22-1641
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Olukayode Ojo
Defendant / Appellee:
H.O. Thomas Decker, Thomas E. Feeley, Robert F. Judge and others
Defendant:
John Tsoukaris, Margo Struass, Officer Anderson and others
Davis v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00443
Petitioner:
Damion G.V Davis
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Secretary of The Department of Homeland Security, ICE Field Office Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Patino Mancia v. ICE/DHS et al
as 6:2022cv06090
Petitioner:
Mauricio Antonio Patino Mancia
Respondent:
ICE/DHS, U.S. Marshalls, Federal Facility: D. O. Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balogun v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
OYEWOLE OLAYIWOLA BALOGUN
Defendant:
United States of America, Jeffery Searls, Michael Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Mathon v. Barr
as 21-3038
Petitioner:
Frantz Mathon
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security and others
Brito v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2021cv01077
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Brito
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brito v. Mayorkas et al.
as 1:2021cv07520
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Brito
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
