Cases 1 - 10 of 305
Hernandez v. Bishop et al
as 1:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hernandez
Defendant:
Travis Bishop, RN Kaitlin White, Warden of Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2023cv00175
Petitioner:
James Pierce
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pitts v. Bureau Of Prisons
as 6:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Pitts v. Bureau Of Prisons
as 6:2022cv01295
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Pitts v. Bureau Of Prisons
as 5:2022cv01390
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Graham v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv00387
Petitioner:
Michael S. Graham
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv00364
Petitioner:
Aaron S. Smith
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Graham v. Bureau of Prisons, FCI-La Tuna
as 3:2022cv00348
Petitioner:
Michael S. Graham
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, FCI-La Tuna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Busby v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Gary L Busby
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Colette Peters, Thomas E. Bergami and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haapaniemi v. Warden Hijar et al
as 3:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Defendant:
Warden Hijar and Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
