Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Profitt v. Hall et al
as 4:2024cv00928
Petitioner:
Amanda Profitt
Respondent:
Tanisha Hall and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reyes v. Hend et al
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Melodio Reyes
Defendant:
Warden Hend, Asst. Warden Galindo, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Juana Idalia Sanchez
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Pitts v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2022cv04432
Plaintiff:
Shannon Thomas Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Officer Derry and FCI Seagoville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2022cv02675
Petitioner:
Debra Wallace Glenn
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Trevino v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
Ramiro Trevino
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nunez-Reynoso v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2022cv00144
Petitioner:
Agustin Nunez-Reynoso
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keaton v. Garland et al
as 4:2022cv02052
Plaintiff:
Brad Keaton
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Powell et al
as 4:2022cv01767
Plaintiff:
Patrick Alan Jackson
Defendant:
Thomas Powell, Hiromichi Kobayashi, Michael Caravajal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
