Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Wright v. State of Georgia, et al et al
as 4:2016cv00289
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
State of Georgia, et al, Polk County Georgia, et al, Baldwin County CSH Georgia, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byron Wright v. State of Georgia, et al
as 15-12563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON SCOTT WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, POLK COUNTY, BALDWIN COUNTY and others
Wright v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2014cv00287
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Polk County, Baldwin County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byron Wright v. Polk County, et al
as 13-13772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON SCOTT WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
POLK COUNTY, BALDWIN COUNTY, GEORGIA, RANDALL HINES, Ph.D, Interim Regional Hospital Administrator and others
Wright v. Polk County et al
as 4:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
Polk County, Baldwin County, Randall Hines and others
Wright v. Polk County, et al et al
as 4:2012cv00277
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
Polk County, et al, Donald Howe Judge, et al and Tallapoosa Judicial Circuit, et al
Wright v. Polk County GA, et al et al
as 4:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
Polk County GA, et al, Baldwin County GA, et al, Randall Hines Ph.D, et al and others
Wright v. Cedartown Standard et al
as 4:2011cv00293
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
Cedartown Standard, Rome News Tribune, Owner's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byron Wright v. Polk County, et al
as 10-15625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON SCOTT WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
POLK COUNTY, POLK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, HARALSON COUNTY and others
Byron Wright v. Kenny Dodd, et al
as 10-15609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON SCOTT WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNY DODD, POLK COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT AND POLICE MEN and BAKER HARBIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
