Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Apple et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00243
Plaintiff:
Patricia Apple and Roger A. Barnett, II
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00591
Plaintiff:
Euphrelia Jones
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2018cv02014
Plaintiff:
Teresa Stewart
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowling v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
Bessie Bowling
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al (TWP1)
as 1:2016cv00161
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Moore
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barnes et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01034
Plaintiff:
Anita Louise Barnes and Janet Kirby
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Root et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00711
Plaintiff:
Judy A. Root and James L. Root
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00228
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLeod v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00227
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, American Medical Systems, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Linda F McLeod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jennette et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
Robbie Jennette and Jerry Jennette
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
