Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02521
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RAMIREZ-TORRES v. HUGHES et al
as 1:2018cv02098
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO RAMIREZ-TORRES
Defendant:
C. RAY HUGHES, HEATHER GRIFFITH, BOBBY HYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01165
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCMILLAN v. HUGHES et al
as 1:2017cv13435
Plaintiff:
LARRY MCMILLAN
Defendant:
C. RAY HUGHES, SGT. JOHN DOE #1, SCO JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALSH v. N.J. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv02442
Plaintiff:
JASON B. WALSH
Defendant:
N.J. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SOUTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, P. NORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROIGE v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2017cv01513
Petitioner:
MARK ROIGE
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and C. RAY HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALSTEAD v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2017cv00809
Plaintiff:
BRYON HALSTEAD
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, C. RAY HUGHES, NARDELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROYAL v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2016cv06498
Petitioner:
HOZAY ROYAL
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and C. RAY HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TORRES v. SOUTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv00143
Petitioner:
HECTOR TORRES
Respondent:
SOUTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and C. RAY HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
POTTER v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv08784
Petitioner:
ERIC POTTER
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and C. RAY HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
