Cases 1 - 9 of 9
R. Johnson v. John Roberts, et al
as 17-5200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
John Roberts, Chief Judge, C. Thomas, Kennedy, Justice and others
JOHNSON v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2017cv00777
Plaintiff:
R. WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, C. THOMAS, KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
THOMAS v. THOMAS
as 1:2012cv01208
Plaintiff:
TERRY C. THOMAS
Defendant:
TERRY C. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWCOMER et al v. CORPORATE AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01029
Plaintiff:
THOMAS NEWCOMER and TERRY C. THOMAS
Defendant:
CORPORATE AMERICA and CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Roeder, et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 10-5355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David M. Roeder, C. Thomas Scott, Don A. Sharer and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Intervenor - Appellee:
United States of America
Christopher Dilorenzo v. Phillip Norton, et al
as 09-7097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Dilorenzo
Defendant - Appellee:
Phillip G. Norton, Bruce M. Bowen, Steven J. Mencarini and others
HAWAII ANNUITY TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS v. HILLS et al
as 1:2008cv00081
Plaintiff:
HAWAII ANNUITY TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS, HAWAII ANNUITY TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS, HAWAII ANNUITY TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS and others
Defendant:
RODERICK M. HILLS, FERNANDO AGUIRRE, MORTEN ARNTZEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
DILORENZO v. NORTON et al
as 1:2007cv00144
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DILORENZO and CHRISTOPHER DILORENZO
Defendant:
PHILLIP G. NORTON, BRUCE M. BOWEN, STEVEN J. MENCARINI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
