Cases 1 - 8 of 8
EVANS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv20747
Plaintiff:
CHIEKO EVANS and WILLIAM C. EVANS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, KENVUE, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EVANS v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv10111
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON C. EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv03201
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN C. EVANS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. NADROWSKI
as 3:2015cv01501
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN C. EVANS, JR
Respondent:
BARRY NADROWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RHETT v. SUPERVIOR C. EVANS et al
as 3:2011cv02099
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. RHETT
Defendant:
SUPERVIOR C. EVANS, PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS CO. , HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
RHETT v. SUPERVIOR C. EVANS et al
as 2:2011cv02099
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. RHETT
Defendant:
SUPERVIOR C. EVANS, PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS CO., HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RHETT v. SUPERVIOR C. EVANS et al
as 3:2011cv02099
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. RHETT
Defendant:
SUPERVIOR C. EVANS, PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS CO., HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. EVANS et al
as 2:2010cv04507
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
JAMES C. EVANS, WINNIFRED MARTIN and UKNOWN TENANTS/OCCUPANTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
