Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Javier Espinoza Rodriguez v. John C Marshall
as 3:2010cv00767
Petitioner:
Javier Espinoza Rodriguez
Respondent:
John C Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shelton v. Marshall et al
as 4:2010cv01100
Petitioner:
Joseph P. Shelton
Respondent:
John C. Marshall and Attorney General For The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Marshall
as 2:2010cv00594
Petitioner:
Robert A. Ortiz
Respondent:
John C. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peter M. Bergne v. John C. Marshall et al
as 2:2010cv01070
Petitioner:
Peter M. Bergne
Respondent:
John C. Marshall and Gregory Totten
Ronald Baltierra v. John Marshall
as 2:2009cv05911
Petitioner:
Ronald Baltierra
Respondent:
John C. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott Howell Duke v. John C. Marshall
as 2:2009cv05888
Petitioner:
Scott Howell Duke
Respondent:
John C. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gene McIntyre v. John C. Marshall
as 2:2009cv05393
Petitioner:
Gene McIntyre
Respondent:
John C. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Keith Lamar Johnson v. John C. Marshall
as 2:2009cv05175
Petitioner:
Keith Lamar Johnson
Respondent:
John C. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Jamal C White v. John C Marshall
as 1:2009cv01013
Petitioner:
Jamal White
Respondent:
John C. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael C. Marshall v. CTX Mortgage et al
as 2:2009cv03667
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Marshall
Defendant:
CTX Mortgage, CTX Mortgage, Chase Home Finance, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.