Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Rodriguez v. Marshall
as 3:2008cv01007
Petitioner:
Javier Espinoza Rodriguez
Respondent:
John C Marshall
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. Marshall, et al
as 2:2008cv01053
Petitioner:
Rory Renia White
Respondent:
John C. Marshall and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sonny Dean Lemos v. John C Marshall
as 2:2008cv02759
Petitioner:
Sonny Dean Lemos
Respondent:
John C Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tarvin v. Marshall et al
as 2:2008cv00528
Petitioner:
David Ray Tarvin
Respondent:
John C. Marshall and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Price v. Marshall
as 2:2007cv02525
Petitioner:
William Henry Price
Respondent:
John C. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grijalva v. Marshall
as 1:2007cv01665
Petitioner:
Louie Grijalva, Jr.
Respondent:
John C. Marshall
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Santibanez v. Marshall et al
as 2:2007cv02359
Petitioner:
Jason V Santibanez
Respondent:
John C. Marshall and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jamal C White v. John C Marshall
as 2:2007cv06847
Petitioner:
Jamal C White
Respondent:
John C Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Louie Grijalva v. John C Marshall
as 2:2007cv06845
Petitioner:
Louie Grijalva, Jr
Respondent:
John C Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Henry Price v. John C Marshall
as 2:2007cv06816
Petitioner:
William Henry Price
Respondent:
John C Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
