Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Phong Tan Luong v. John E Tilton et al
as 2:2007cv06484
Petitioner:
Phong Tan Luong
Respondent:
Jame E Tilton and John C Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antuan Hakobian v. John C Marshall
as 2:2007cv06348
Petitioner:
Antuan Hakobian
Respondent:
John C Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeffrey Ray Cross v. John C Marshall
as 2:2007cv05730
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ray Cross
Respondent:
John C Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Henry Price v. John C Marshall et al
as 2:2007cv05348
Petitioner:
William Henry Price
Respondent:
John C Marshall, James Tilton, Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Marshall
as 3:2007cv01240
Petitioner:
Paul Thomas
Respondent:
John C Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelton v. Marshal et al
as 2:2007cv01246
Petitioner:
Joseph P. Shelton
Respondent:
John C. Marshal and Attorney General for the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adam Robert Robinson v. John C Marshall
as 2:2007cv01606
Petitioner:
Adam Robert Robinson
Respondent:
John C Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jason V Santibanez v. John C Marshall
as 2:2007cv00612
Petitioner:
Jason V Santibanez
Respondent:
John C Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steven Elias v. John C Marshall et al
as 2:2007cv00438
Plaintiff:
Steven Elias
Defendant:
John C Marshall, E Greenman, Faecher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Earl Walker v. J C Marshall
as 2:2007cv00449
Plaintiff:
Earl Walker
Defendant:
J C Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
