Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Nooth
as 2:2014cv01266
Petitioner:
C. Michael Gonzalez-Aguilera
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
C. Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Steve Franke
as 13-35452
Petitioner - Appellant:
C. MICHAEL GONZALEZ-AGUILERA
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE FRANKE
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Peters et al
as 2:2013cv00374
Defendant:
Timothy Clayton, Ms. Howton and Colette Peters
Plaintiff:
C. Michael Gonzalez-Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Peters et al
as 1:2013cv00374
Defendant:
Timothy L Clayton, Ms. Howton and Colette Peters
Plaintiff:
C. Michael Gonzalez-Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Shelton M.D. et al
as 2:2012cv02269
Defendant:
Dr. Daniel Dewsnup, Dr. Hansen and Steven Shelton M.D.
Plaintiff:
C. Michael Gonzalez-Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Franke
as 2:2012cv01745
Respondent:
Steve Franke
Petitioner:
C. Michael Gonzalez-Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Franke
as 2:2012cv01438
Respondent:
Steve Franke
Petitioner:
C. Michael Gonzalez-Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
C. Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Jeff Premo
as 12-35594
Petitioner - Appellant:
C. MICHAEL GONZALEZ-AGUILERA
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFF PREMO
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Coursey
as 2:2012cv00687
Respondent:
Rick Coursey
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
C. Michael Gonzalez-Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Premo
as 6:2011cv01058
Petitioner:
C. Michael Gonzalez-Aguilera
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
