Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Raymond Bradford v. Usher, et al
as 21-16253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
USHER, RIMBACH, GERMAN and others
Defendant:
C. OGBUEHI
Raymond Bradford v. USDC-CAFR
as 20-73687
Petitioner:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Not Classified By Court:
C. OGBUEHI, NIETAS and In re: RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Daniel Coston v. Majiad Rahimifar, et al
as 20-17058
Defendant:
CONALL MCCABE, M.D., ALCANNO, Medical Doctor and C. OGBUEHI, Physician Asst.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL MURPHY COSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
AHMED MUSHTAQ and MAJIAD RAHIMIFAR, M.D.
Morris Roberson v. USDC-CAFR
as 19-70351
Petitioner:
MORRIS ROBERSON
Undetermined:
A. MANASRAH, Nurse Practitioner, C. OGBUEHI, Nurse Practitioner, C. RELEVANTE, Nurse Practitioner and others
Other:
In re: MORRIS ROBERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Raymond Bradford v. C. Ogbuehi, et al
as 19-15073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
C. OGBUEHI and NIETAS
Bradford v. Ogbuehi
as 1:2017cv01128
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
C. Ogbuehi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. Manasrah, et al.
as 1:2017cv01062
Plaintiff:
Morris Roberson
Defendant:
A. Manasrah, C. Ogbuehi, C. Relevante and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coston v. Rahimifar et al
as 1:2017cv00765
Plaintiff:
Daniel Murphy Coston
Defendant:
Majiad Rahimifar, Alcanno, Conall McCabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garbarini v. Mendivil et al
as 1:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Ralph Garbarini
Defendant:
D. Mendivil, Hernandez, Moniza Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon E. Bjerkhoel v. Scharffenberg et al
as 1:2016cv00507
Plaintiff:
Brandon E. Bjerkhoel
Defendant:
Robert G. Scharffenberg and C. Ogbuehi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
