Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wilson v. Reid, et al
as 20-5015
Defendant / Appellee:
G. T. BYNUM, individually and official capacity, Mayor of City of Tulsa, OKLAHOMA SECRETARY OF STATE, Office of, STANLEY GLANTZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SILAS WILSON, JR.
Wilson v. Reid, et al
as 19-5017
Defendant / Appellee:
G. T. BYNUM, individually and official capacity, Mayor of City of Tulsa, OKLAHOMA SECRETARY OF STATE, Office of, STANLEY GLANTZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SILAS WILSON, JR.
Wilson v. Reid et al
as 4:2018cv00374
Defendant:
Keith C Reid, Don Newberry, FNU LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Silas Wilson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Reid et al
as 5:2018cv00587
Plaintiff:
Silas Wilson, Jr
Defendant:
Keith C Reid, Chuck Jordan, G T Bynum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-6100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-6206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Gold Resource Corp., et al, et al
as 13-1323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BANKER NITESH, SCOTT CANTOR and ROBERT D. RHODES
Defendant - Appellee:
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION, JASON D. REID, WILLIAM W. REID and others
City of Bristol Pension Fund v. Reid et al
as 1:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
City of Bristol Pension Fund
Defendant:
William W. Reid, Jason D. Reid, William M. Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Rhodes v. Gold Resource Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv02971
Plaintiff:
Robert D Rhodes
Defendant:
Gold Resource Corporation, William W. Reid, Jason D. Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.