Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gonzalez v. Richard & Rice Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv21856
Plaintiff:
Enrique Gonzalez
Defendant:
Richard & Rice Construction Company, Inc. , Murray C. Rice and Gaetan F. Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Toledo v. Richard & Rice Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv01718
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Toledo
Defendant:
Richard & Rice Construction Company, Inc. , Murray C. Rice and Gaetan F. Richard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rice v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv05923
Plaintiff:
Shane C. Rice
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rice v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv05923
Plaintiff:
Shane C. Rice
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lipnicki et al v. Meritage Homes Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00605
Plaintiff:
David Lipnicki, Neil Alba, Donna Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Meritage Homes Corporation and Meritage Homes of Texas, LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff:
James McLaughlin, Jr, Dinise Dimiceli, Elma Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Martikainen v. Richard & Rice Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv61243
Plaintiff:
Paul Martikainen
Defendant:
Richard & Rice Construction Company, Inc., Murray C. Rice and Gaetan F. Richard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Martikainen v. Richard & Rice Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv00676
Plaintiff:
Paul Martikainen
Defendant:
Richard & Rice Construction Company, Inc., Murray C. Rice and Gaetan F. Richard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rice v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2008cv00118
Plaintiff:
Stephen C Rice
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
