Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Coleman v. Davol et al
as 1:2016cv04080
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee Coleman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deinlein et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03191
Plaintiff:
Nancy M. Deinlein and Paul B. Deinlein
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc. and Does 1 through 100 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shackleford v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02278
Plaintiff:
David Shackleford
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grimsley v. Wynne et al
as 8:2013cv00405
Defendant:
Ernest C. Wynne, III, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Mid-Atlantic States, Inc., Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Cherylene E. Grimsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grimsley v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 8:2012cv02263
Plaintiff:
Cherylene E. Grimsley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tobin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02115
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Tobin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steiner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00980
Plaintiff:
Willetta Steiner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Covidien plc, Covidien Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00961
Plaintiff:
Timothy Martin
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooks et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00942
Plaintiff:
Joan Hooks and Michael Hooks
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, C.R. Bard, Inc., Covidien plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mosher v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00917
Plaintiff:
Pamela Mosher
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, C.R. Bard, Inc., Covidien plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
