Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 136
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Bures v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02420
Plaintiff: Florence Bures
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keegan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02152
Plaintiff: Audrey R. Keegan
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAVIOUR v. STAVROPOULOS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv05362
Plaintiff: LEZLIE SAVIOUR
Defendant: S. WILLIAM STAVROPOULOS , C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TATE v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01220
Plaintiff: JENNIFER CAMPBELL TATE
Defendant: C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
GROSS v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05110
Plaintiff: KEVIN GROSS
Defendant: C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mears v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01253
Plaintiff: Claudette Y. Mears
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and Does 1 through 100 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STRONG v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03015
Plaintiff: JOYCE STRONG
Defendant: ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON , C.R. BARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEAVER v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03035
Plaintiff: BRENDA WEAVER
Defendant: ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON , C.R. BARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FESTERMAN v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02899
Plaintiff: DEBORAH D. FESTERMAN
Defendant: ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON , C.R. BARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ENNIS v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02911
Plaintiff: JAIME ANN ENNIS
Defendant: ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON , C.R. BARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?