Cases filed in Virginia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00031
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ISS, Inc. v. Cambridge Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01345
Plaintiff: ISS, Inc.
Defendant: Cambridge Systems, Inc., Cambridge Global Services, Inc., Madhavi Doki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carl Zeiss Microimaging, Inc. v. Cambridge Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01008
Plaintiff: Carl Zeiss Microimaging, Inc.
Defendant: Cambridge Systems, Inc. and Cambridge Global Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pharmaron, Inc. v. Doki et al
as 1:2010cv01001
Plaintiff: Pharmaron, Inc.
Defendant: Suresh Doki, Madhavi Dioki, Goldbert Raven, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Bay Pointe Technology, LTD. v. Cambridge Systems, Inc.
as 1:2010mc00042
Plaintiff: Bay Pointe Technology, LTD.
Defendant: Cambridge Systems, Inc.
Lumenis, Inc. v. Cambridge Systems, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00865
Plaintiff: Lumenis, Inc.
Defendant: Cambridge Systems, Inc. and Bank Hapoalim, B.M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pharmaron, Inc. v. Cambridge Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00280
Plaintiff: Pharmaron, Inc.
Defendant: Cambridge Systems, Inc. and Cambridge Global Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jeol USA, Inc. v. Cambridge Systems, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01081
Plaintiff: Jeol USA, Inc. and Jeol USA, Inc.
Defendant: Cambridge Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract None
Patterson Dental Supply, Inc. v. Cambridge Systems, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01044
Plaintiff: Patterson Dental Supply, Inc.
Defendant: Cambridge Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?