Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv81251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ming et al v. The Enclave at Balmoral, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv01873
Defendant:
The Enclave at Balmoral, LLC, Ronaldo Soccer Academy (Haines City), LLC a Florida Limited liability company and Feltrim Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Qi Ming, Cao Jian, Zhang Wenquan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Cao v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00432
Petitioner:
Ulises Raul CAO
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CAO v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00273
Petitioner:
Ulises Raul CAO
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cao v. Bank Of America, N.A. et al
as 0:2022cv61930
Plaintiff:
Liying Cao
Defendant:
Bank Of America, N.A. and Irving Waltmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
PEREZ v. BIRD ROAD BAKERY, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv23097
Plaintiff:
MARIO PEREZ
Defendant:
BIRD ROAD BAKERY, LLC, VICKY BAKERY KENDALL, INC, CARLOS DEVARONA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CAO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42502
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CAO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
