Cases 21 - 30 of 4,503
MASHBURN et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80181
Plaintiff:
JAMES L MASHBURN, SR. and FRANCES V MASHBURN
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DUNCAN et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80173
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M DUNCAN and SANDRA C DUNCAN
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SKONIECZNY et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv66016
Plaintiff:
LEONARD P. SKONIECZNY and DORIS M. SKONIECZNY
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMILTON et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv65866
Plaintiff:
DAVID JAMES HAMILTON and RUTHANNE HAMILTON
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SKINNER et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv65871
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE C. SKINNER and FONDA J. SKINNER
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WYERS et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv66021
Plaintiff:
DELMAR D WYERS and DELORES WYERS
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REDDICK et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv66015
Plaintiff:
GEORGE P. REDDICK, JR. and MARY REDDICK
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDANIEL v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv65870
Plaintiff:
RAY V. MCDANIEL, SR.
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GASPER et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv65867
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. GASPER and MARY ANN GASPER
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv66020
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. TAYLOR and IRMA TAYLOR
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
