Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez-Rivera v. Garza et al
as 4:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Carlos Sanchez-Rivera
Defendant:
Warden Garza, Counselor Betos, Case Manager Roundtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport et al v. The State of Ohio et al
as 2:2022cv04419
Plaintiff:
Carlos Davenport and United States Of America
Defendant:
The State of Ohio and Franklin County of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crespo v. Fender
as 1:2022cv01065
Petitioner:
Carlos D. Crespo
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
as 2:2022cv02042
Petitioner:
Carlos D. Thompson
Respondent:
Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller et al v. Cicone
as 4:2021cv02292
Plaintiff:
Brian Miller, Sr.
Defendant:
C.O. Echenrod and Attorney Carlos Cicone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia-Toro v. McConahay
as 1:2020cv02645
Petitioner:
Carlos Garcia-Toro
Respondent:
Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Mohr et al
as 2:2020cv04141
Plaintiff:
Carlos Richardson
Defendant:
Steven Gause, Gary Mohr, Jeffery Noble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philips v. Williams
as 4:2020cv00983
Petitioner:
Carlos M. Phillips
Respondent:
Warden Mark K. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bayon v. North East Ohio Core Civic (NEOCC) et al
as 4:2020cv00551
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bayon
Defendant:
North East Ohio Core Civic (NEOCC), US Marshals, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
