Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-5237
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Antonio Defaria, Francis Canary, Jr., Dorothy Peirce and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of the Interior and David Longly Bernhardt, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-5238
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Kim Dorsey, Deborah Canary, Richard Lewry and others
Defendant / Appellee:
David Longly Bernhardt, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior and United States Department of the Interior
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe
In re: Carol Murphy
as 16-5003
In Re - Petitioner:
In re: Carol Murphy, one of the posterity, a flesh and blood woman/private attorney general
MURPHY v. FEDERAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv02217
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
FEDERAL CORPORATION, JAMES E. FINCH, SCOTT A. RAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. FEDERAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv01325
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
FEDERAL CORPORATION, JONATHAN SMITH, EARL SAUNDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2015cv00579
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JONATHAN SMITH, EARL SAUNDERS, Charles Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. CASAVANT et al
as 1:2014cv02165
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JANE AND JOHN DOE'S, DONALD MARDEN, JOSHUA ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MURPHY v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2014cv01775
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and JANE & JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2014cv01615
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., MAINE STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
