Cases 1 - 5 of 5
COBB v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
DONALD L. COBB
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, METRO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Cobb v. Vincent Gray, et al
as 12-7067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald L. Cobb
Defendant - Appellee:
Vincent C. Gray, Jim Graham, Jack Evans and others
COBB v. GRAY et al
as 1:2012cv01081
Plaintiff:
DONALD L. COBB
Defendant:
VINCENT C. GRAY, JIM GRAHAM, JACK EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banner, James M., et al v. USA, et al
as 04-5190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James M. Banner, Jr., Henry J. Brothers, II, Marilyn Tyler Brown and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Bathrus B. Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice and Alberto R. Gonzales, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Defendant - Terminated Party:
John D. Ashcroft, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Commonwealth of Virginia and State of Maryland
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County, Virginia, Board of Supervisors of Loudoun County, Virginia, Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County, Virginia and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
District of Columbia Affairs Section and Former Presidents of the District of Columbia Bar
Kingman Park Civic, et al v. Williams, Anthony A., et al
as 02-7100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kingman Park Civic Association and Chevy Chase Civic Association
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony A. Williams, Acting in his official capacity as Mayor of the District of Columbia, Linda W. Cropp, Acting in her official capacity as Chairwoman of the D. C. Council, Harold Brazil, Acting in his official capacity as councilmember of the D.C. Council and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
