Cases 1 - 10 of 127
SRM-Kodiak America, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company v. Pilling et al
as 4:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
SRM-KODIAK AMERICA, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company and SRM-Kodiak America, LLC
Defendant:
Brek Pilling, Scott Pilling, KODIAK AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graf, et al. v. Christensen
as 4:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
Gregory Graf, Marguerite Shaw, Suellen Carman and others
Defendant:
chad christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Idaho County Light and Power Cooperative Association, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00391
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Idaho County Light and Power Cooperative Association, Inc., Gary L. Hegvet and Carolyn Hegvet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Cutler v. Colvin
as 2:2017cv00159
Plaintiff:
Shawn Timothy Cutler
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Seaberg et al v. Lloyd
as 4:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Valerie Seaberg , Michael Osgood and Carolyn McAleavy
Defendant:
Ryan M Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horne v. Colvin
as 4:2017cv00121
Petitioner:
Scott O Horne
Respondent:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bravo v. Colvin
as 1:2017cv00089
Petitioner:
Tara Lynn Bravo
Respondent:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lahti v. Colvin
as 1:2017cv00080
Petitioner:
Natalie Lahti
Respondent:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
