Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bauer et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2021cv04659
Plaintiff:
Ethan Bauer, Richard Gill-Kellum and Clayborne Dennis
Defendant:
CDCR Secretary Ralph Diaz, Clarence Cryer, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl Cutting et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2021cv00918
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Jose Gonzalez, Carl Cutting, Frank Adam Liendo Godinez and others
Defendant:
CDCR Secretary Ralph Diaz, State Of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ardell McDuffie et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2021cv00824
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Rogers, Daniel Cesario Ramirez, Ardell McDuffie and others
Defendant:
CDCR Secretary Ralph Diaz, Warden Cynthia Y. Tampkins, Kerry Oglesby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Demaruea North v. The People of the State of California et al
as 2:2020cv10234
Defendant:
The People of the State of California, KVSP Warden C. Pfeifer and CDCR Secretary Ralph Diaz
Plaintiff:
Demaruea North
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Melendez, et al. v. Diaz, et al.
as 1:2020cv01393
Defendant:
Warden Rosemary Ndoh, CDCR Secretary Ralph Diaz, Avenal State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Emerson Gaitan, John Melendez, Phillip Bernard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Ivan Kocak v. Peter C Deddeh et al
as 8:2020cv01141
Defendant:
Pacific Investment Management Company, Ralph Diaz, Atlantic Financial and others
Plaintiff:
John Ivan Kocak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Melendez v. CDCR Secretary Ralph Diaz, et al.,
as 1:2020at00146
Defendant:
Warden Rosemary NDOH (as an individual and in her official capacity), Pleasant Valley State Prison, CDCR Secretary Ralph Diaz (as an individual and in his official capacity and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
