Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
CESTRA et al v. CEPHALON, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01842
Plaintiff: MATTHEW CESTRA , STATE OF NEW YORK and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX. REL. MATTHEW CESTRA
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC. and JOHN DOES #1-100
Movant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
PHYSICIANS HEALTHSOURCE, INC. v. CEPHALON, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv03753
Plaintiff: PHYSICIANS HEALTHSOURCE, INC.
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC. , CEPHALON CLINICAL PARTNERS, L.P. , CEPHALON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
KRINSK v. CEPHALON, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv04053
Plaintiff: JEFFREY R. KRINSK
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL BRUCE BOISE ET AL VS CEPHALON, INC.ET AL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00287
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC. and JOHN DOES#1-100
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION v. CEPHALON, INC.
as 2:2007cv05284
Plaintiff: PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
INDIANA CARPENTERS WELFARE FUND v. CEPHALON, INC.
as 2:2007cv04775
Plaintiff: INDIANA CARPENTERS WELFARE FUND
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY et al v. CEPHALON, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv04492
Plaintiff: EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, EMCASCO INSURANCE COMPANY and UNION INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?