Cases 21 - 30 of 24,752
GRIMES et al v. AT&T et al
as 2:2015cv08466
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GRIMES and ESTELLE GRIMES
Defendant:
AT&T, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED, BELL ASBESTOS MINES LTD and others
Cross_claimant:
FLOWSERVE US INC. , FMC CORPORATION , RARITAN SUPPLY COMPANY and others
Cross_defendant:
ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP., ALLIED GLOVE & SAFETY PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING CORP. , ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CONNEEN et al v. AMATEK, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01063
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CONNEEN and KATHLEEN CONNEEN
Defendant:
AMATEK, INC., BW/IP, INC. , CBS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
CRANE CO. , GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and CBS CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
AMATEK, INC., BW/IP, INC. , CBS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
VESPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2015cv01322
Plaintiff:
GEORGE VESPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY , ALCAREL-LUCENT USA, INC., AMERICAN PREMIER UNDERWRITERS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
REX et al v. BRAND INSULATIONS, INC. et al
as 5:2015cv00324
Plaintiff:
ROBERT REX and VIRGINIA REX
Defendant:
BRAND INSULATIONS, INC. , BECHTEL CORPORATION, BURNHAM CORPORATION and others
Movant:
PENNSYLVANIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY
Cross_claimant:
BRAND INSULATIONS, INC. , METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., INC. , CBS CORPORATION and others
Cross_defendant:
BRAND INSULATIONS, INC. , BECHTEL CORPORATION, BURNHAM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DePalma v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv01307
Plaintiff:
Louis DePalma
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , American Optical Corporation , Asbestos Corporation Ltd. and others
Cross_claimant:
FMC Corporation , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and Asbestos Corporation Ltd.
Cross_defendant:
FMC Corporation , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henderson et al v. AO Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv01213
Plaintiff:
Paul M. Henderson and Mary Henderson
Defendant:
AO Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atwood & Morrill Co. and others
Cross_claimant:
Bird Incorporated
Cross_defendant:
AO Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atwood & Morrill Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bartlett v. ABB Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01087
Plaintiff:
Fred E. Bartlett
Defendant:
ABB Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust and others
Cross_claimant:
Warren Pumps LLC, Union Carbide Corporation, Clyde Union Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Warren Pumps LLC , ABB Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Murray et al v. BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01060
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Murray and Marlyn Carrothers
Defendant:
BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., CBS Corporation , Certainteed Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., CBS Corporation , Marlyn Carrothers and others
Cross_claimant:
Cleaver-Brooks Inc. , Trane US Inc. , Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rose et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
David Rose and Freda Rose
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCCOURT et al v. A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et al
as 2:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES MCCOURT and MABEL MCCOURT
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ALCATEL-LUCENT USA , BORG-WARNER CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
PFIZER, INC.
Cross_defendant:
PFIZER, INC. , A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ALCATEL-LUCENT USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
