Cases 1 - 10 of 29
SAMUELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08225
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E SAMUELS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Isaac v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv00187
Plaintiff:
Wendell D. Isaac
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meza v. Samuels
as 3:2017cv00597
Plaintiff:
Jesus Meza, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venkataram v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv23044
Plaintiff:
Natarajan Venkataram
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons , J Hollingsworth, Dynan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Montalban v. Samuels et al
as 5:2016cv00405
Plaintiff:
Jose Montalban
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., FNU Schultz, Tamyra Jarvis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cunningham v. United States of America, et al.
as 5:2015cv00305
Defendant:
FNU Morlote, United States of America, Warden, FCC Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dent v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
Jason Dent
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Joe Zimmerman, Helen J. Marberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAGER v. AUGUSTINE
as 5:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
DONALD W RAGER
Defendant:
PAIGE AUGUSTINE, KEITH BUFORD, S MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUTCHINSON v. SAMUELS
as 5:2015cv00011
Petitioner:
COLIN FRANKLIN HUTCHINSON
Respondent:
CHARLES E SAMUELS, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STEVENS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al.
as 5:2014cv00338
Plaintiff:
LEWIS STEVENS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES E SAMUELS, JR, N C ENGLISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
