Cases 11 - 20 of 112
David Greenberg v. Charles Ryan
as 18-72242
Petitioner:
DAVID LEVY GREENBERG
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden
Rey Aguirre v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-16490
Petitioner - Appellant:
REY DAVID AGUIRRE
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Kenneth Shatzer v. Charles Ryan
as 18-72189
Petitioner:
KENNETH EUGENE SHATZER
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden
Antoinne Jolly v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-16466
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTOINNE JOLLY
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Derrick Morris v. Charles Ryan
as 18-72173
Petitioner:
DERRICK A. MORRIS
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden
Loren Williamson, III v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-16441
Petitioner - Appellant:
LOREN WILLIAMSON III, AKA Loren Williamson
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Arizona Department of Corrections and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Jonathan Edgar v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-16443
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN B. EDGAR
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Anant Tripati v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 18-16446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., Health Care Provider, ADOC, CALVIN JOHNSON, Doctor/Policy Maker, Corizon-Tennessee, LUCY BURCIAGA, Doctor/Policy Maker, Corizon-Tucson and others
Alfredo Quijada v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-16435
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALFREDO QUIJADA
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Victor Parsons, et al v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-16424
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR ANTONIO PARSONS, SHAWN JENSEN, STEPHEN SWARTZ and others
Plaintiff:
ARIZONA CENTER FOR DISABILITY LAW
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and RICHARD PRATT, Interim Division Director, Division of Health Services, Arizona Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
