Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Victor Parsons, et al v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-16424
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR ANTONIO PARSONS, SHAWN JENSEN, STEPHEN SWARTZ and others
Plaintiff:
ARIZONA CENTER FOR DISABILITY LAW
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and RICHARD PRATT, Interim Division Director, Division of Health Services, Arizona Department of Corrections
Victor Parsons, et al v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-16398
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VICTOR ANTONIO PARSONS, SHAWN JENSEN, STEPHEN SWARTZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and RICHARD PRATT, Interim Division Director, Division of Health Services, Arizona Department of Corrections
Movant - Appellant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., Prospective Defendant Intervenor
Victor Parsons, et al v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-16365
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VICTOR ANTONIO PARSONS, SHAWN JENSEN, STEPHEN SWARTZ and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and RICHARD PRATT, Interim Division Director, Division of Health Services, Arizona Department of Corrections
Victor Parsons, et al v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-16358
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VICTOR ANTONIO PARSONS, SHAWN JENSEN, STEPHEN SWARTZ and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and RICHARD PRATT, Interim Division Director, Division of Health Services, Arizona Department of Corrections
Victor Parsons, et al v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-16368
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VICTOR ANTONIO PARSONS, SHAWN JENSEN, STEPHEN SWARTZ and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and RICHARD PRATT, Interim Division Director, Division of Health Services, Arizona Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
