Cases 1 - 10 of 54
(PC) Richard v. CHCF et al
as 2:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
Craig Richard
Defendant:
CHCF, Richardson, Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Overton v. Warden CHCF et al
as 2:2024cv01274
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Overton
Defendant:
Warden CHCF and Warden CMC East
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Duncan v. CHCF Warden et al
as 2:2024cv00775
Plaintiff:
Diontae Johan Duncan
Defendant:
CHCF Warden, Deputy Rivera, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Wren v. CHCF Stockton Prison-Hospital
as 2:2024cv00455
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Charles Wren
Respondent:
CHCF Stockton Prison-Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poslof v. Martel, et al.
as 23-4135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE LEE POSLOF, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden of CHCF and MA, Correctional Officer
(PC) Benton v. Maldonado et al
as 2:2023cv02882
Plaintiff:
Ryan Benton
Defendant:
C. Maldonado, G. Jones, CHCF Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. CHCF Warden et al
as 4:2023cv05682
Plaintiff:
Diontae Johan Duncan
Defendant:
CHCF Warden, Officer Rivera, Officer Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Foust v. Campo et al
as 2:2023cv02099
Plaintiff:
Carl Foust
Defendant:
P. Campo, N. Kahlon, Anugwara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Springfield v. CDCR et al
as 2:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
Ciron B. Springfield
Defendant:
CDCR, CHCF Stockton, Kevin Tan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Overton v. Governor of the State of CA, et al
as 2:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Overton
Defendant:
Governor of the State of California, T. Walls, CHCF Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
