Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Vashisht-Rota v. Bluechip Services, et al.
as 26-556
Plaintiff:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Defendant:
BLUECHIP SERVICES, (International), An India Private Limited Company, BLUECHIP SERVICES INTERNATIONAL CHENNAI, An India Private Limited Company, MOHAMMED HARISS, An Individual and others
Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services, LLC, et al.
as 26-232
Plaintiff:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Defendant:
HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF UTAH, CHRIS HOWELL and others
Vashisht-Rota v. Howell, et al.
as 25-4501
Plaintiff:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Defendant:
TARA HOWELL, CHRIS HOWELL, JUSTIN HOWELL and others
Vashisht-Rota v. Howell et al
as 3:2025cv01532
Plaintiff:
Aparna Vashisht-Rota
Defendant:
Chris Howell, Tara Howell, Justin Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 bc Breach of Contract
Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services, et al.
as 25-556
Plaintiff:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Defendant:
HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES and CHRIS HOWELL
Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services et al
as 3:2025cv00179
Plaintiff:
Aparna Vashisht-Rota
Defendant:
Howell Management Services, Chris Howell, Tara Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 bc Breach of Contract
Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services, et al.
as 24-7821
Defendant:
CHRIS HOWELL and HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Plaintiff:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Howell et al v. Oney et al
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
William Chris Howell and Tonya B Howell
Defendant:
Dustyn A Oney and Terry D Merritt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Shaw v. Howell
as 2:2024cv02300
Plaintiff:
Norman Shaw, Jr.
Defendant:
Chris Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services, et al.
as 24-994
Plaintiff:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Defendant:
HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, a Utah limited liability company and CHRIS HOWELL, an individual
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
