Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Hogan v. Perez-Lugo et al
as 3:2026cv01152
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Hogan
Defendant:
Elliot Perez-Lugo, Christina Crews, Winter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Dixon et al
as 3:2026cv00624
Plaintiff:
Kelvin D. Harris
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Warden John Godwin, Christina Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Sherman, Jr. v. C.M. Camacho, et al
as 25-13781
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JAMAL SHERMAN, JR.
Defendant:
C.M. CAMACHO, ALACHUA COUNTY JAIL WARDEN, CHRISTINA CREWS and others
Kenneth Sherman, Jr. v. C.M. Camacho, et al
as 25-13491
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JAMAL SHERMAN, JR.
Defendant:
C.M. CAMACHO, ALACHUA COUNTY JAIL WARDEN, CHRISTINA CREWS and others
Steven Aitken v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 25-11342
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MICHAEL AITKEN
Defendant:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, POLK, ASSISTANT WARDEN CHRISTINA CREWS and others
Aitken v. Dixon et al
as 3:2025cv00009
Defendant:
Sergeant Robinson, Warden Chris Lane, Captain Minnich and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Aitken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv01326
Plaintiff:
Javonte Hill
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, A. Johns, Asst. Warden Christina Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toledo v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Toledo
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Lisa Delk, A. Johns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Sherman, Jr. v. C.M. Camacho, et al
as 24-12754
Defendant:
CHRISTINA CREWS, S. A. MASSEY, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JAMAL SHERMAN, JR.
Moultrie v. Minshew et al
as 3:2024cv00617
Defendant:
A. Brown, Cynthia Russell, J. Minshew and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Moultrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
