Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MACK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26090
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MACK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHARLES v. PITTMAN et al
as 3:2022cv10106
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MACK CHARLES
Defendant:
P A PITTMAN, S CARROLL, S G MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65738
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MACK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACKING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57326
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MACKING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACK v. AEARO HOLDING LLC et al
as 7:2021cv54798
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MACK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02125
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MACK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv98691
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MACK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv01454
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Christopher Mack Charles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIVINE et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03135
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK RUFO, NATHANIEL RENTZ, DAVID CUNNINGHAM and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mack v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv23791
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mack
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
