Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROSENBERG et al
as 2:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ADAM ROSENBERG, HOWARD I. ROSENBERG, KIMBERLY L. ROSENBERG and others
Intervenor:
HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
ROSENBERG et al v. CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
HOWARD I. ROSENBERG and KIMBERLY L. ROSENBERG
Defendant:
CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
ROSENBERG et al v. HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY L. ROSENBERG and HOWARD I. ROSENBERG
Defendant:
HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY and CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MARKS et al v. CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2016cv05062
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MARKS and DENISE MARKS
Defendant:
CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIPSEY v. CHUBB & SON et al
as 2:2014cv04556
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. LIPSEY
Defendant:
CHUBB & SON and CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROSENTHAL v. CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2011cv06702
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ROSENTHAL
Defendant:
CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMSON et al v. CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2011cv06476
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY WILLIAMSON and CAROLINE WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
PINCHOT v. CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2009cv05082
Plaintiff:
DALE PINCHOT
Defendant:
CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
PECARSKY v. CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2007cv03650
Plaintiff:
JAN PECARSKY
Defendant:
CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
