Cases filed in Utah
Cases 1 - 10 of 744
Brunner v. Thompson et al
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff: Donald Earl Brunner
Defendant: J. Thompson, FNU Cox, FNU Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caro Land Co. II, LLC v. Pleasant View City Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv00331
Plaintiff: Caro Land Co. II, LLC
Defendant: Pleasant View City Corp. and Brandon Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caro Land Co. II, LLC v. Pleasant View City Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff: Caro Land Co. II, LLC
Defendant: Pleasant View City Corp. and Brandon Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Other Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00321
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brooks v. Murray City Police Department
as 2:2024cv00311
Plaintiff: Janay Brooks
Defendant: Murray City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liberty Addiction Recovery Centers, LLC v. Bluffdale City
as 2:2024cv00239
Plaintiff: Liberty Addiction Recovery Centers, LLC
Defendant: Bluffdale City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Muir v. Springville City et al
as 2:2024cv00207
Plaintiff: Steven Donnell Muir
Defendant: Springville City, Springville Police Department, Lance Haight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miles et al v. City of St. George
as 2:2024cv00191
Plaintiff: John Miles and Sarah Wei Wu
Defendant: City of St. George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miles et al v. City of St. George
as 4:2024cv00034
Counter Defendant: John Miles and Sarah Wei Wu
Counter Claimant: City of St. George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of North Branch
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff: Eric Smith
Defendant: City of North Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?