Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00730
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
HAYDOUTOVA et al v. CITIBANK, N.A.
as 1:2022cv02662
Plaintiff:
JULIANA HAYDOUTOVA and Metody Tilev
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
EKOPEL D.O.O. v. CITIBANK N.A. et al
as 1:2022cv02554
Defendant:
CITIBANK N.A., CITIGROUP, CITI and others
Plaintiff:
EKOPEL D.O.O.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
CITIBANK, N.A. v. LANCE BAILEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv02373
Defendant:
LANCE BAILEY & ASSOCIATES, INC., LANCELOT O BAILEY, THE BAILEY HENDERSON LIVING TRUST and others
Plaintiff:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEHRBACH v. CITIBANK, N.A.
as 1:2017cv02739
Plaintiff:
TARA L. MEHRBACH
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. CITIBANK, N.A.
as 1:2017cv02581
Plaintiff:
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CITIBANK, N.A. v. NOVAK et al
as 1:2017cv01593
Plaintiff:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Defendant:
GREGORY V. NOVAK and TRACY W. DRUCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA, et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 16-5220
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
Lindsay Jenkins
TRAN v. CITIBANK, N.A.
as 1:2015cv01309
Plaintiff:
MAI THI THU TRAN
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
