Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Foyston v. Citibank
as 3:2010cv00935
Plaintiff:
Christopher Foyston
Defendant:
Citibank
Cross_claimant:
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
Cross_defendant:
Christopher Foyston , Britt Thompson and ROES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv05334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adele Schneidereit v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
as 2:2009cv07498
Plaintiff:
Adele Schneidereit
Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. and Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Greenfield v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. et al
as 4:2009cv02411
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Greenfield
Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. and Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02107
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hughson v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. et al
as 3:2009cv00796
Plaintiff:
Chris Hughson
Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., Citigroup, Inc. and Vengroff, Williams & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
