Cases 61 - 70 of 118
Rafael Esquivel v. Citibank, N.A., et al
as 13-11716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAFAEL ARECHIGA ESQUIVEL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIBANK, N.A. and CITIGROUP INC.
AHMED-AL-KHALIFA v. QUEEN ELIZABETH II et al.
as 5:2013cv00103
Defendant:
BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, QUEEN ELIZABETH II, BEATRIX WILHEMIA ARMGARD and others
Plaintiff:
OLUWASHINA KAZEEM AHMED-AL-KHALIFA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palmer v. Citigroup Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Christopher Palmer
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc. and United Collection Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Sethi v. Citigroup, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Harjeet S. Sethi
Defendant:
Citigroup, Inc., Citigroup Technology, Inc. and Citigroup North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Diaz Briscoe Medina, P.A. et al v. LaRocca et al
as 1:2012cv24527
Plaintiff:
Diaz Briscoe Medina, P.A. and ESPERANZA DIAZ BRISCOE
Defendant:
Tami LaRocca and Citigroup, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Coonan v. CitiBank, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv24378
Defendant:
CitiBank, N.A., CitiMortgage, Inc., Citigroup, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Celeste Coonan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Arechiga Esquivel v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv23423
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arechiga Esquivel
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and Citigroup, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Earl Bryant v. Citigroup Inc., et al
as 12-14219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL A BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIGROUP INC. and CITIMORTAGE, INC.
Abram-Adams v. CitiGroup Inc.
as 9:2012cv80848
Plaintiff:
Patricia Abram-Adams
Defendant:
CitiGroup Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Patricia Abram-Adams v. Citigroup Inc.
as 12-13276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA ABRAM-ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIGROUP INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
