Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Capital Trail Vehicle Association et al v. U.S. Forest Service et al
as 6:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Capital Trail Vehicle Association, Citizens for Balanced Use, Ken Salo and others
Defendant:
U.S. Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, The U.S. Forest Service, Northern Region and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ten Lakes Snowmobile Club, et al v. USFS, et al
as 18-35014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEN LAKES SNOWMOBILE CLUB, MONTANANS FOR MULTIPLE USE, North Lincoln County Chapter, CITIZENS FOR BALANCED USE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, U.S. FOREST SERVICE, Northern Region, KOOTENAI NATIONAL FOREST and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, HEADWATERS MONTANA, IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE and others
Ten Lakes Snowmobile Club, et al v. USFS, et al
as 17-36028
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TEN LAKES SNOWMOBILE CLUB, MONTANANS FOR MULTIPLE USE, North Lincoln County Chapter, CITIZENS FOR BALANCED USE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, U.S. FOREST SERVICE, Northern Region, KOOTENAI NATIONAL FOREST and others
Intervenor-Defendant:
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, HEADWATERS MONTANA, IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE and others
BITTERROOT RIDGE RUNNERS SNOWMOBILE CLUB et al v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE et al
as 9:2016cv00158
Plaintiff:
BITTERROOT RIDGE RUNNERS SNOWMOBILE CLUB , RAVALLI COUNTY OFF-ROAD USER ASSOCIATION , BITTERROOT BACKCOUNTRY CYCLISTS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE , U.S. FOREST SERVICE, Northern Region , BITTERROOT NATIONAL FOREST and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Ten Lakes Snowmobile Club et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 9:2015cv00148
Plaintiff:
Ten Lakes Snowmobile Club , Montanans for Multiple Use , Citizens for Balanced Use and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, U.S. Forest Service, Kootenai National Forest and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
The Pryors Coalition, et al v. Leslie Weldon, et al
as 11-35733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE PRYORS COALITION, a coalition of non-profit organizations and individuals, WILDLANDS CPR, a non-profit organization, EASTERN WILDLANDS CHAPTER OF THE MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION, a non-profit organization and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LESLIE WELDON, in her official capacity as Regional Forester for the United States Forest Service, Region One, MARY ERICKSON, in her official capacity as Acting Forest Supervisor of the Custer National Forest and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
TREASURE STATE ATV ASSOC., MONTANA TRAIL VEHICLE ASSOC., GREAT FALLS TRAIL BIKE RIDERS ASS'N and others
Beaverhead County Commissioners et al vs USFS
as 2:2010cv00068
Plaintiff:
Beaverhead County Commissioners , Tom Rice , Mike McGinley and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service , Leslie Weldon and Dave Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Citizens for Balanced Use v. Mary Erickson
as 10-35823
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITIZENS FOR BALANCED USE
Applicant-in-intervention - Appellant:
MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION, GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION and THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY
Defendant:
MARY ERICKSON, Gallatin National Forest Supervisor
Citizens For Balanced Use v. Erickson et al
as 2:2010cv00017
Plaintiff:
Citizens For Balanced Use
Defendant:
Mary Erickson and United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Montana Wilderness Association, et al v. Treasure State Alliance, et al
as 09-36080
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION, GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, INC. and others
Defendant-counter-defendant:
KATHLEEN MCALLISTER, Regional Forester for Region 1, REBECCA HEATH and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant:
TREASURE STATE ALLIANCE, MONTANA TRAIL VEHICLE RIDERS ASSOCIATION, MONTANA SNOWMOBILE ASSOCIATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
